1. The quality of conformity with fact; correctness; accuracy. 2. The exactness of the correct who, what, where, when, how, why, mood and intention.
Category: GOLDZONE Education Page 4 of 23
1. A module consisting of a radio receiver and transmitter. 2. Any person, place, object, or subject that can receive and transmit.
1. The phenomena where people who have an agreement to cooperate, openly or covertly see others as rivals and compete to be the best, number one, most successful, leader or superior person through sabotage, suppression or domination. 2. One considered to have the dominant position or highest authority, especially as a result of a competitive victory.
1. A period or interval; duration; continuance. 2. The period between two events, or during which something happened, exists or acts. 3. A precise instant, second, minute, hour, day, week, month, or year, determined by clock or calendar. 4. The point at which something has happened is happening or will happen.
Someone who says nothing remains silent and does not express or declare openly, by implied consent to go ahead with and that it is ok to Sabotage. This person operates on “I won’t fix mine if you don’t fix yours”, “I won’t look if you don’t look”, “I won’t know if you don’t know”, “I won’t plan if you won’t plan”, “I won’t act if you won’t act”, “I won’t learn if you won’t learn”, “I won’t work hard if you don’t work hard.” Tacit realities are deadly and are never true, but appear to be true due to the unspoken, unexpressed agreements.
1. A complex whole’ set of connected things or parts; organized body of material or immaterial. 2. A network of interdependent components that work together to accomplish the aim of the system. 3. The performance of the whole results from the interaction of the parts, not from the sum of the parts. 4. Things need to come together in harmony, not each part doing its best, an orchestra is a good example.
1. The interaction of two or more agents or forces so that their combined effect is less than the sum of their individual effects. 3. The potential ability of individual organizations or groups to be less successful and nonproductive as a result of a merger. 4. Competitive interaction between partners in a relationship that creates a reduced combined result that is less than the sum of their individual results.